In a recent interview with Aleyda Solis, Google’s Search Liaison, Danny Sullivan, discussed the company’s approach to ranking smaller websites versus larger brands.
This topic has long been a point of contention, with concerns that Google’s ranking systems favor brands over independent sites.
Fairness In Search Results
Sullivan claims that Google doesn’t inherently favor brands, stating:
“Our ranking systems aren’t saying ‘are you a big brand therefore you rank’… The core of it isn’t really whether you’re big or you’re small, the core of it is whether you have the most useful, the most relevant, most satisfying information.”
The Perception Problem
Despite Google’s stance, Sullivan acknowledged the widespread perception that larger, well-established sites have an advantage in search results.
He recognized the frustration of smaller site owners who feel they cannot compete with bigger brands for visibility.
Sullivan states:
“I have looked at cases where people say you don’t like small sites, and I am not taking away from any of the real concerns because they are there… I wish they were doing better, but I can also see co-occurring in some of the same queries that I’m given other independent sites that are doing well.”
Challenges & Improvements
Sullivan admitted that Google’s systems sometimes fail to recognize high-quality content from smaller sites.
He assured that the company is actively improving this aspect of its algorithms.
Sullivan said:
“We don’t want it to be only the very big things rank well and I think in the last update we did talk about how we were taking in a lot of these concerns and trying to understand how we can do more for some of the smaller sites, the so-called independent sites.”