In a recent discussion on Reddit’s r/SEO forum, Google’s Search Advocate, John Mueller, cautioned against relying too heavily on third-party SEO metrics.
His comments came in response to a person’s concerns about dramatic changes in tool measurements and their perceived impact on search performance.
The conversation was sparked by a website owner who reported the following series of events:
A 50% drop in their website’s Domain Authority (DA) score.
A surge in spam backlinks, with 75% of all their website’s links acquired in the current year.
An increase in spam comments, averaging 30 per day on a site receiving about 150 daily visits.
A discrepancy between backlink data shown in different SEO tools.
The owner, who claimed never to have purchased links, is concerned about the impact of these spammy links on their site’s performance.
Mueller’s Perspective On Third-Party Metrics
Mueller addressed these concerns by highlighting the limitations of third-party SEO tools and their metrics.
He stated:
“Many SEO tools have their own metrics that are tempting to optimize for (because you see a number), but ultimately, there’s no shortcut.”
He cautioned against implementing quick fixes based on these metrics, describing many of these tactics as “smoke & mirrors.”
Mueller highlighted a crucial point: the metrics provided by SEO tools don’t directly correlate with how search engines evaluate websites.
He noted that actions like using disavow files don’t affect metrics from SEO tools, as these companies don’t have access to Google data.
This highlights the need to understand the sources and limitations of SEO tool data. Their metrics aren’t direct indicators of search engine rankings.