“What Google has done is they’ve pulled bits out of the text based on what people are searching for and fed them what they want to read.”
Mark Williams-Cook, founder of AlsoAsked, commented on the findings, stating:
“Google builds models to try and predict what people like, but the problem is this creates a kind of feedback loop. If confirmation bias pushes people to click on links that reinforce their beliefs, it teaches Google to show people links that lead to confirmation bias.”
Implications
These findings have implications for content creators and SEO professionals:
Featured Snippets may not accurately represent comprehensive content
User intent heavily influences how content is interpreted and displayed
Content strategy may need adjustment to maintain accuracy across various query formats
Google’s spokesperson defended the system, stating that users can find diverse viewpoints if they scroll beyond initial results.
The company also highlighted features like “About this result” that help users evaluate information sources.
Recommendations
Based on these findings, publishers should take the following actions:
Develop comprehensive content that remains accurate regardless of how queries are phrased.
Recognize the impact of search intent on the selection of Featured Snippets.
Track how your content is displayed in Featured Snippets for different search phrases.
As Google moves toward becoming an “answer engine” with AI-generated responses, digital marketers and content creators need to understand these limitations.
Featured Image: Song_about_summer/Shutterstock