A model for agency success

A model for agency success

Agencies have several teams, some of which are formed over the years and some that come together quickly as new hires join and new clients are onboarded.

Agency teams include executive leadership, marketing channel leaders and cross-functional groups or pods responsible for supporting clients. 

With the complexity found in most agencies, it can be challenging to assess which are your highest-performing teams – or know what to do when one isn’t performing quite at the level you’d like.

Patrick Lencioni’s book, “The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team,” can serve as a framework for evaluating each team’s performance to identify areas of opportunity or find the most unified groups.

In summary, the model illustrates the five areas in which teams must thrive to become high-performing. The goal is to be highly functional by avoiding the five most common dysfunctions: 

Absence of trust.

Fear of conflict.

Lack of commitment. 

Avoidance of accountability.

Inattention to results.

From leadership groups to pods, it’s essential to recognize the stage in which each team operates. Clients have high expectations, and to meet or exceed those expectations, building high-performing teams is critical.

Once a leader of an agency, division or client team recognizes how their team is operating, they can address the gaps to become exceptional.

We’ll start by exploring the lowest level – trust – since that is the foundational element of any high-performing team. All other facets and dimensions of this model are built upon trust and once that foundation is set, teams can begin to progress toward becoming the highest-achieving team possible.

Dysfunction 1: The absence of trust

If this dysfunction is present, people don’t feel comfortable being vulnerable, which prevents them from building trust with each other. 

Without trust, moving up the pyramid and creating the optimal environment for high-performing teams is impossible.

In the absence of trust, you may notice some or all of the following: failure to get feedback, unpleasant or avoided meetings or politics.

Questions to consider

Are team members slow to seek credit for their own work but point out the success of others?

Do your colleagues open up about strengths and weaknesses?

Do people speak up when they make mistakes and apologize?

Agency or team impact 

If people don’t feel safe, they may not surface mistakes or concerns that could make them look bad. This could mean that issues are brushed under the table or linger longer than necessary.

How to begin to address it

Showing that vulnerability can be validated, instead of always negatively reinforced through punishment, is important. Build bonds by sharing something personal that others don’t know. The leader goes first so that it creates a safe space.

Dig deeper: Scaling an agency: Lessons of growth and change

Dysfunction 2: Fear of conflict

If this dysfunction exists, there’s generally a lack of healthy debate and discussion in meetings. 

People may be more interested in keeping the peace than moving the ball forward. When there is a fear of conflict, meetings may be boring and little progress is made.

Questions to consider

Do your team members openly give each other feedback?

Are the most essential issues put forward in team meetings to be resolved?

Is the team comfortable sharing their point of view?

Do people debate issues to find the best answers?

Agency or team impact 

If people aren’t comfortable with conflict, they may disagree with the direction handed down by leaders (or even a client) or suppress information that could improve campaigns or the business.

The lack of conflict also stifles innovation and growth, where an organic “third solution” is the best path forward.

How to begin addressing it

The leader of the pod or team should ask for differing opinions and state that healthy conflict is not only acceptable but encouraged.

Dysfunction 3: Lack of commitment

When this dysfunction is present, the team struggles to make commitments they will stick with. There is a lack of buy-in, and that generally leads to second-guessing.

Questions to consider

Are team members aligned and willing to go the extra mile to ensure success?

Are people committed to shared goals and understand how each person contributes?

Does your team leave meetings confident that they are committed to the common goals and decisions, even if they weren’t aligned initially?

Agency or team impact 

Anyone who has worked for an agency knows it’s fast-paced and important to get alignment on strategies, tasks/projects to complete and new processes.

When there’s a lack of commitment, the team doesn’t act as a unified front – which can lead to not finishing tasks or projects, insubordination or continuously revisiting the same topics. 

How to begin addressing it

Set clear deadlines for key decisions and push for issue closure before the end of meetings. Ensure your team is using committed actions rather than just saying, “Sure, I’ll get it done.” 

An example of a committed action response would be, “Yes, I’ll have that to you by Friday EOD” or “I can’t get it done by Friday EOD, but is it OK if I get it to you on Monday by noon.”

Tinggalkan Balasan

Alamat email Anda tidak akan dipublikasikan. Ruas yang wajib ditandai *